Committee: Enviromental
Topic: “Informing the American people about the Pros and Cons of GM food”
Sponsor: United States
The General Assembly,
Deeply concerned about the lack of information on the GM food that the American people are consuming.
Realizing that the government is not concern about the risks of consuming GM food.
Encouraging an article about the pros and cons of eating GM food in the community.
Affirming the labeling of GM food in stores in the community.
Stressing those GM products are being consume by the American people without even knowing. Also knowing that the research that has been done has been made by the companies that make the GM products, So the results most likely are bias
Taking into account that the United States think that GM food does not pose any risk for human consumption.
1. Proposes an article on the pros and cons of eating GM food.
2. Applauds the actions taken by some non-profit organizations on trying to pass a similar action mention above.
3. Suggests that more research take place on the risks on the consumption of GM products and its effect on the environment by the government.
4. Demands a law that requires companies to label GM products in the United States.
5. Expresses the concern of the government over what the American people are eating and their health.
Daniel Vargas
Topic: “Informing the American people about the Pros and Cons of GM food”
Sponsor: United States
The General Assembly,
Deeply concerned about the lack of information on the GM food that the American people are consuming.
Realizing that the government is not concern about the risks of consuming GM food.
Encouraging an article about the pros and cons of eating GM food in the community.
Affirming the labeling of GM food in stores in the community.
Stressing those GM products are being consume by the American people without even knowing. Also knowing that the research that has been done has been made by the companies that make the GM products, So the results most likely are bias
Taking into account that the United States think that GM food does not pose any risk for human consumption.
1. Proposes an article on the pros and cons of eating GM food.
2. Applauds the actions taken by some non-profit organizations on trying to pass a similar action mention above.
3. Suggests that more research take place on the risks on the consumption of GM products and its effect on the environment by the government.
4. Demands a law that requires companies to label GM products in the United States.
5. Expresses the concern of the government over what the American people are eating and their health.
Daniel Vargas
Committee: Environmental Rights
Topic: The impact of GMO
Sponsor: The world
The General Assembly,
Deeply concerned by the unethical methods of genetic modifications in consumable nourishing substances( liquid/solid) that provide energy, promote growth, and that are broken down in the body to sustain life,
Realizing that edible material should not be altered then eaten without fully comprehending the health risks and allergic reactions the body will encounter,
Encouraging food not being tampered by genetic engineering since everything on this planet consumes food by creating awareness about foods that are inorganic,
Affirming the labeling of no genetic engineering ingredients and the segregation of GE crops and seeds from the conventional ones (www.greenpeace.org),
Stressing Monsanto, which is the world’s leading producer of the herbicide glyphosate and the second largest producer of GE seeds, should be banned from producing GE seeds until everything is known about the outcomes of GM consumption,
Taking into account
1. Proposing that getting involved with any movement to create awareness around GM food can create change and solutions that the movement is fighting for.
2. The calling for the moratorium on GM crops by delivering the first European citizens initiative to commissioner Dalli in Europe.
3. Suggests that people become aware and send letters to local officials
4. Demands the more widely practiced labeling of GM foods
5. Expresses hope for finding the outcomes of consuming genetically modified foods and the ban on GM foods if harmful.